MNDFX vs. MNHYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009.
Performance
MNDFX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -1.11% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.30% | 8.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than MNHYX's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.59% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
MNHYX
MNDFX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.64 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.23 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 4.86 | +0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 1.46 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 1.59 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.79 | -1.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and MNHYX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than MNHYX's 6.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.93% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than MNHYX's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and MNHYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -19.70% | -42.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -3.38% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -10.84% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -19.70% | -42.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -2.20% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -1.57% | -10.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 0.86% | +2.28% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) at 1.50%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 1.50% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 2.06% | +6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 3.66% | +12.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 3.66% | +10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 4.15% | +17.52% |