EXBAX vs. MNHYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX).
EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993. MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009.
Performance
EXBAX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXBAX vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -4.84% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -14.52% | 7.97% | 14.96% | 16.15% | -3.54% | 11.59% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -1.11% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.30% | 8.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXBAX achieves a -4.84% return, which is significantly lower than MNHYX's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, EXBAX has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 5.08%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.59% annualized return.
EXBAX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -4.84%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXBAX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXBAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXBAX vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank
EXBAX
MNHYX
EXBAX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXBAX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.24 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.64 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.23 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | 4.86 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXBAX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.24 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.46 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 1.59 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.79 | -1.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXBAX and MNHYX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EXBAX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison
EXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, less than MNHYX's 6.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 6.06% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.93% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
EXBAX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, which is greater than MNHYX's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXBAX and MNHYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXBAX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.86% | -19.70% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -3.38% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -10.84% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.23% | -19.70% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -2.20% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -1.57% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 0.86% | +0.81% |
Volatility
EXBAX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) at 1.50%. This indicates that EXBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXBAX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 1.50% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.03% | 2.06% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.91% | 3.66% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 3.66% | +3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 4.15% | +3.45% |