MNBAX vs. MNDFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008.
Performance
MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than MNDFX's 5.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has outperformed MNDFX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while MNDFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.78% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than MNDFX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. MNDFX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
MNDFX
MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | MNDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.15 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.65 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.25 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.41 | -1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 5.63 | -4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | MNDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.15 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.61 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.22 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.40 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and MNDFX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than MNDFX's 9.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, smaller than the maximum MNDFX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and MNDFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | MNDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -62.03% | +22.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -12.54% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -17.87% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -62.03% | +40.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -5.55% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -12.11% | +5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 3.14% | -0.97% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) at 3.14%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | MNDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 3.14% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 8.66% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 16.53% | -6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 14.51% | -5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 21.67% | -12.01% |