MNBAX vs. MNDFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MNBAX (Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series) and MNDFX (Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series) are both mutual funds - MNBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Manning & Napier, while MNDFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Manning & Napier. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX returned 6.85%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for MNDFX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNBAX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for MNDFX.

Performance

MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than MNDFX's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has outperformed MNDFX with an annualized return of 6.85%, while MNDFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.

MNBAX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 9.12%
• 3Y*: 7.86%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 6.85%

MNDFX

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 11.68%
• 6M: 10.78%
• 1Y: 26.97%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 5.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series	1.78%	10.01%	7.16%	13.16%	-16.70%	11.27%	17.65%	19.30%	-4.31%	14.90%
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series	11.68%	15.76%	11.60%	5.64%	-4.22%	22.45%	2.44%	-28.95%	-4.30%	23.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MNBAX and MNDFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2008	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between MNBAX and MNDFX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MNBAX vs. MNDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNBAX

MNBAX Risk / Return Rank: 13
MNBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MNBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MNBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MNBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MNBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

MNDFX

MNDFX Risk / Return Rank: 80
MNDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
MNDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
MNDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
MNDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MNDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNBAX	MNDFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	2.37	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	3.53	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.42	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	4.09	-3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.70	14.58	-10.88

MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the MNDFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNBAX and MNDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, smaller than the maximum MNDFX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and MNDFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNBAX	MNDFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.62%	-62.03%	+22.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.23%	-6.70%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.28%	-16.04%	+5.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-17.87%	-4.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.95%	-62.03%	+40.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-2.55%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-11.98%	+5.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.88%	+0.52%

Volatility

MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNBAX	MNDFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.38%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.36%	8.15%	-0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.88%	11.54%	-2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.54%	14.51%	-4.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.76%	21.68%	-11.92%

MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than MNDFX's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNBAX vs. MNDFX - Dividend Comparison

MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than MNDFX's 8.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series	9.97%	10.14%	4.23%	1.81%	3.68%	5.12%	6.49%	4.49%	5.73%	6.53%	1.15%	2.05%
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series	8.80%	9.64%	10.46%	7.81%	9.77%	7.31%	1.93%	5.18%	15.02%	24.95%	4.89%	15.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNBAX and MNDFX in my portfolio?

MNBAX and MNDFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNBAX or MNDFX?

MNDFX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to MNBAX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNBAX dropped -39.62% vs MNDFX's -62.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.