PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MNA vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MNA and QQQM is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MNA vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.95%
19.71%
MNA
QQQM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MNA:

1.88

QQQM:

1.38

Sortino Ratio

MNA:

2.73

QQQM:

1.87

Omega Ratio

MNA:

1.36

QQQM:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

MNA:

0.99

QQQM:

1.85

Martin Ratio

MNA:

9.00

QQQM:

6.42

Ulcer Index

MNA:

0.86%

QQQM:

3.91%

Daily Std Dev

MNA:

4.13%

QQQM:

18.23%

Max Drawdown

MNA:

-16.68%

QQQM:

-35.05%

Current Drawdown

MNA:

-0.20%

QQQM:

-2.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNA achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 2.61% return.


MNA

YTD

1.59%

1M

0.85%

6M

3.95%

1Y

8.04%

5Y*

0.83%

10Y*

2.14%

QQQM

YTD

2.61%

1M

1.17%

6M

19.72%

1Y

23.24%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MNA vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
Expense ratio chart for MNA: current value at 0.77% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.77%
Expense ratio chart for QQQM: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNA vs. QQQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNA is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNA is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNA is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNA is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNA is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNA is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQM is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQM is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MNA vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNA, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.881.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNA, currently valued at 2.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.731.87
The chart of Omega ratio for MNA, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.361.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNA, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.991.85
The chart of Martin ratio for MNA, currently valued at 9.00, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.009.006.42
MNA
QQQM

The current MNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNA and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.88
1.38
MNA
QQQM

Dividends

MNA vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.00%0.00%1.20%0.00%0.00%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.87%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.59%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MNA vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNA drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNA and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.20%
-2.37%
MNA
QQQM

Volatility

MNA vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) is 1.20%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that MNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.20%
5.90%
MNA
QQQM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab