PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMTM vs. JMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMTM vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.79% return.


MMTM

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.46%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.58%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.00%

JMOM

1D
-0.17%
1M
9.35%
YTD
22.79%
6M
22.27%
1Y
36.77%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMTM vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
9.16%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%4.48%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
22.79%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-5.25%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and JMOM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.89

The correlation between MMTM and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

MMTM vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMTM
JMOM

Technology

29.5%
38.1%

Financial Services

16.0%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
6.9%

Healthcare

10.8%
8.7%

Communication Services

7.7%
8.3%

Industrials

7.6%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
5.7%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.5%

Utilities

2.6%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.3%

Energy

1.7%
3.8%

Technology

MMTM
29.5%
JMOM
38.1%

Financial Services

MMTM
16.0%
JMOM
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MMTM
12.4%
JMOM
6.9%

Healthcare

MMTM
10.8%
JMOM
8.7%

Communication Services

MMTM
7.7%
JMOM
8.3%

Industrials

MMTM
7.6%
JMOM
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

MMTM
6.7%
JMOM
5.7%

Real Estate

MMTM
3.1%
JMOM
2.5%

Utilities

MMTM
2.6%
JMOM
2.3%

Basic Materials

MMTM
2.0%
JMOM
1.3%

Energy

MMTM
1.7%
JMOM
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMTM vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMTM vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMTMJMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

4.69

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

22.24

-11.10

MMTM vs. JMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the JMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and JMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMTMJMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.58

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.88

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.82

+0.03

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, roughly equal to the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and JMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMTMJMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-34.31%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-7.87%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-19.51%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-28.26%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.17%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-6.32%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.66%

+0.52%

Volatility

MMTM vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 2.35%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMTMJMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

4.62%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

11.55%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

14.32%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

18.65%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

20.13%

-1.48%

MMTM vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MMTM and JMOM have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MMTM vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than JMOM's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.71%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%0.00%0.00%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.78%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMTM and JMOM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMOM has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs JMOM's -34.31%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 13.50% for MMTM. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM and JMOM have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.

MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan.

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMTM and JMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer