MMLG vs. PFM
MMLG (First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MMLG is actively managed, while PFM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MMLG returned 8.34%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for PFM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMLG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.
Performance
MMLG vs. PFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMLG achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than PFM's 8.18% return.
MMLG
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 16.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- —
PFM
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
MMLG vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 4.76% | 17.28% | 25.96% | 45.21% | -39.18% | 13.23% | 20.61% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 8.18% | 14.00% | 16.87% | 11.40% | -6.22% | 23.08% | 11.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMLG and PFM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between MMLG and PFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MMLG vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMLG
PFM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
MMLG
PFM
Financial Services
MMLG
PFM
Consumer Cyclical
MMLG
PFM
Industrials
MMLG
PFM
Healthcare
MMLG
PFM
Communication Services
MMLG
PFM
Consumer Defensive
MMLG
PFM
Basic Materials
MMLG
PFM
Energy
MMLG
PFM
Utilities
MMLG
PFM
Real Estate
MMLG
-
PFM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMLG vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank
MMLG
PFM
MMLG vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMLG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 2.78 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 11.28 | -8.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMLG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.09 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.79 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.53 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
MMLG vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMLG drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMLG and PFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMLG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.97% | -53.21% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -7.09% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -14.50% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.97% | -17.81% | -28.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -0.23% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -6.94% | -7.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 1.75% | +5.16% |
Volatility
MMLG vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that MMLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMLG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 2.04% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 7.13% | +6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 9.47% | +8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 13.54% | +11.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 15.21% | +9.33% |
MMLG vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMLG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMLG vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison
MMLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.58% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 1.70% | 2.56% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMLG and PFM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMLG has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMLG dropped -45.97% vs PFM's -53.21%.
On 5-year performance, PFM leads with 10.63% vs 8.34% for MMLG. On fees, PFM is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFM has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 8.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFM is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MMLG.
PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for MMLG.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MMLG and 0.53% for PFM.
PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMLG and PFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer