PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMLG vs. FMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MMLG vs. FMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MMLG vs. FMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MMLG
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
-11.52%17.28%25.96%45.21%-39.18%8.36%
FMAG
Fidelity Magellan ETF
-7.35%10.40%28.52%31.25%-26.92%25.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMLG achieves a -11.52% return, which is significantly lower than FMAG's -7.35% return.


MMLG

1D
4.24%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
-11.52%
6M
-13.49%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*

FMAG

1D
3.30%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
-7.35%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
8.83%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMLG vs. FMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMLG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MMLG vs. FMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMLG
MMLG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MMLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MMLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAG
FMAG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMLG vs. FMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMLGFMAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

0.44

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

0.79

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.11

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

0.63

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.24

2.22

+0.02

MMLG vs. FMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the FMAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMLG and FMAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMLGFMAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

0.44

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.48

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.47

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between MMLG and FMAG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MMLG vs. FMAG - Dividend Comparison

MMLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MMLG
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.25%
FMAG
Fidelity Magellan ETF
0.09%0.09%0.15%0.34%0.23%0.03%0.00%

Drawdowns

MMLG vs. FMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMLG drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, which is greater than FMAG's maximum drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMLG and FMAG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MMLGFMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.97%

-32.93%

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.89%

-13.97%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.97%

-32.93%

-13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.49%

-11.13%

-5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.61%

-9.22%

-5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.42%

3.98%

+2.44%

Volatility

MMLG vs. FMAG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) at 6.36%. This indicates that MMLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MMLGFMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

6.36%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

11.05%

+3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.87%

19.95%

+4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.99%

19.85%

+5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

19.83%

+4.91%