MMID vs. VO
MMID (MFS Active Mid Cap ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. MMID is actively managed, while VO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMID charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
MMID vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 10.84% return.
MMID
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
MMID vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 4.05% | 0.62% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.84% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMID and VO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMID vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
MMID
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VO
MMID vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMID | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMID vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMID | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -58.87% | +50.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.85% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -7.84% | +5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility
MMID vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMID | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 12.78% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 17.66% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 18.93% | -5.39% |
MMID vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMID vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than VO's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 0.48% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMID and VO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MMID.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.48% for MMID.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.03% for VO.
Find the right allocation for MMID and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer