PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMID vs. MFSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMID vs. MFSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than MFSM's 0.95% return.


MMID

1D
1.13%
1M
3.37%
6M
8.12%
YTD
9.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MFSM

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.40%
6M
0.10%
YTD
0.95%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$564.46K$466.13K$441.40K
$6.06K$8.30K$14.37K

MMID vs. MFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
9.93%0.62%
MFSM
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
0.95%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MMID and MFSM is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMID vs. MFSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMID

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MFSM
MFSM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMID vs. MFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMIDMFSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

MMID vs. MFSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMID vs. MFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, which is greater than MFSM's maximum drawdown of -3.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and MFSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMIDMFSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-3.86%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.53%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-0.86%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

Volatility

MMID vs. MFSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMIDMFSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

2.66%

+10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

3.38%

+9.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

3.38%

+9.81%

MMID vs. MFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MFSM's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMID vs. MFSM - Dividend Comparison

MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than MFSM's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MFSM
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
3.61%3.53%0.23%
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
0.67%0.28%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMID and MFSM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFSM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFSM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MMID.

MFSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.67% for MMID.

MMID is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MFSM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.34% for MFSM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMID and MFSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer