MMID vs. MFSM
MMID (MFS Active Mid Cap ETF) and MFSM (MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMID is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while MFSM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by MFS. Both are actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MMID charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for MFSM.
Performance
MMID vs. MFSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than MFSM's 0.95% return.
MMID
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MFSM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $564.46K | $466.13K | $441.40K | |
| $6.06K | $8.30K | $14.37K |
MMID vs. MFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 9.93% | 0.62% |
MFSM MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF | 0.95% | 1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMID and MFSM is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMID vs. MFSM — Risk / Return Rank
MMID
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFSM
MMID vs. MFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMID | MFSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMID vs. MFSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, which is greater than MFSM's maximum drawdown of -3.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and MFSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMID | MFSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -3.86% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.53% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -0.86% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility
MMID vs. MFSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMID | MFSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 2.66% | +10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 3.38% | +9.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 3.38% | +9.81% |
MMID vs. MFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MFSM's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMID vs. MFSM - Dividend Comparison
MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than MFSM's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MFSM MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF | 3.61% | 3.53% | 0.23% |
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 0.67% | 0.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMID and MFSM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFSM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFSM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MMID.
MFSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.67% for MMID.
MMID is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MFSM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.34% for MFSM.
Find the right allocation for MMID and MFSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer