PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPX vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPX vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 12.12%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.


MLPX

1D
0.51%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
21.97%
6M
24.86%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
12.12%

VIG

1D
0.25%
1M
2.48%
YTD
7.43%
6M
8.06%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPX vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
21.97%4.96%42.90%15.77%21.54%39.63%-20.32%19.04%-15.64%-4.53%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.43%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPX and VIG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPX and VIG has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MLPX vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPX
VIG

Energy

99.6%
3.5%

Utilities

0.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.1%

Financial Services

-

20.6%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Industrials

-

11.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

26.2%

Energy

MLPX
99.6%
VIG
3.5%

Utilities

MLPX
0.3%
VIG
3.2%

Basic Materials

MLPX

-

VIG
3.5%

Communication Services

MLPX

-

VIG
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MLPX

-

VIG
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

MLPX

-

VIG
10.1%

Financial Services

MLPX

-

VIG
20.6%

Healthcare

MLPX

-

VIG
16.5%

Industrials

MLPX

-

VIG
11.8%

Real Estate

MLPX

-

VIG

-

Technology

MLPX

-

VIG
26.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPX vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPX vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPXVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.54

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

10.27

-3.55

MLPX vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPX and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPX vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPXVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.67%

-46.81%

-23.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-7.91%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

-14.95%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-20.39%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.70%

-31.72%

-32.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-0.72%

-6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-5.50%

-11.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.95%

+1.42%

Volatility

MLPX vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.86%. This indicates that MLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPXVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

2.86%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

7.71%

+3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

10.13%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

14.24%

+5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

16.06%

+10.42%

MLPX vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPX vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.20%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPX and VIG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to VIG (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.17% vs 12.12% for MLPX. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.

MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while VIG is Dividend. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.04% for VIG.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPX and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer