MLPX vs. NML
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML).
MLPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2013. NML is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 26, 2013.
Performance
MLPX vs. NML - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPX vs. NML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.52% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 25.95% | 4.36% | 40.55% | 14.61% | 32.75% | 61.76% | -45.84% | 10.60% | -23.02% | 7.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 23.52% return, which is significantly lower than NML's 25.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has outperformed NML with an annualized return of 14.53%, while NML has yielded a comparatively lower 12.90% annualized return.
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 23.52%
- 6M
- 20.89%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.25%
- 5Y*
- 24.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
NML
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 25.95%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 28.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPX vs. NML - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NML's 2.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPX vs. NML — Risk / Return Rank
MLPX
NML
MLPX vs. NML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPX | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.60 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.66 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 5.64 | -1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPX | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.37 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.08 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPX and NML is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLPX vs. NML - Dividend Comparison
MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than NML's 6.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.06% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 6.67% | 8.24% | 7.94% | 10.19% | 4.26% | 3.54% | 8.33% | 9.76% | 9.87% | 7.04% | 8.63% | 15.44% |
Drawdowns
MLPX vs. NML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, smaller than the maximum NML drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and NML.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPX | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -90.48% | +19.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.92% | -15.72% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -21.40% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.70% | -84.84% | +20.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -0.66% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.81% | -37.54% | +20.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 4.62% | +0.19% |
Volatility
MLPX vs. NML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) is 3.63%, while Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that MLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPX | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.14% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 12.52% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 21.79% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 23.88% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 35.35% | -8.76% |