NML vs. SRV
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV).
NML is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 26, 2013. SRV is an actively managed fund by NXG. It was launched on Aug 24, 2007.
Performance
NML vs. SRV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NML vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 21.40% | 4.36% | 40.55% | 14.61% | 32.75% | 61.76% | -45.84% | 10.60% | -23.02% | 7.07% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 11.90% | 5.05% | 52.30% | 19.88% | 20.11% | 50.45% | -41.65% | 33.99% | -21.61% | -4.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NML achieves a 21.40% return, which is significantly higher than SRV's 11.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NML having a 12.48% annualized return and SRV not far ahead at 13.03%.
NML
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 21.40%
- 6M
- 20.83%
- 1Y
- 19.33%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- 27.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
SRV
- 1D
- -4.83%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 16.27%
- 3Y*
- 28.41%
- 5Y*
- 26.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NML vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NML has a 2.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NML vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank
NML
SRV
NML vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NML | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.72 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 0.97 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 0.84 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | 2.60 | +2.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NML | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.72 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 1.01 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.34 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.03 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between NML and SRV is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NML vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison
NML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, less than SRV's 17.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 6.92% | 8.24% | 7.94% | 10.19% | 4.26% | 3.54% | 8.33% | 9.76% | 9.87% | 7.04% | 8.63% | 15.44% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 17.81% | 19.31% | 13.86% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Drawdowns
NML vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NML drawdown since its inception was -90.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NML and SRV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NML | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.48% | -92.93% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | -18.46% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -26.26% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.84% | -81.70% | -3.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -20.71% | +16.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.53% | -48.79% | +11.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 5.98% | -1.35% |
Volatility
NML vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) is 5.53%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that NML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NML | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 8.21% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 14.24% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.10% | 22.73% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 26.27% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.36% | 38.34% | -2.98% |