NML vs. TYG
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG).
NML is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 26, 2013. TYG is an actively managed fund by Tortoise.
Performance
NML vs. TYG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NML vs. TYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 25.95% | 4.36% | 40.55% | 14.61% | 32.75% | 61.76% | -45.84% | 10.60% | -23.02% | 7.07% |
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 25.59% | 8.46% | 60.18% | -0.37% | 24.20% | 46.86% | -70.31% | 1.79% | -24.74% | 3.17% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NML having a 25.95% return and TYG slightly lower at 25.59%. Over the past 10 years, NML has outperformed TYG with an annualized return of 12.90%, while TYG has yielded a comparatively lower 2.35% annualized return.
NML
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 25.95%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 28.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
TYG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 25.59%
- 6M
- 22.94%
- 1Y
- 29.72%
- 3Y*
- 31.98%
- 5Y*
- 25.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NML vs. TYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NML has a 2.72% expense ratio, which is lower than TYG's 2.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NML vs. TYG — Risk / Return Rank
NML
TYG
NML vs. TYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NML | TYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.78 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.56 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 6.61 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NML | TYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.09 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.05 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.11 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between NML and TYG is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NML vs. TYG - Dividend Comparison
NML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, less than TYG's 9.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 6.67% | 8.24% | 7.94% | 10.19% | 4.26% | 3.54% | 8.33% | 9.76% | 9.87% | 7.04% | 8.63% | 15.44% |
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 9.89% | 11.25% | 7.96% | 9.87% | 8.94% | 5.27% | 10.85% | 14.61% | 13.17% | 9.01% | 8.54% | 13.95% |
Drawdowns
NML vs. TYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NML drawdown since its inception was -90.48%, smaller than the maximum TYG drawdown of -95.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NML and TYG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NML | TYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.48% | -95.34% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.72% | -18.76% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -25.08% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.84% | -94.98% | +10.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -28.36% | +27.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -29.40% | -8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 4.42% | +0.20% |
Volatility
NML vs. TYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) is 4.14%, while Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that NML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NML | TYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 7.81% | -3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 13.83% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 22.42% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 23.76% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.35% | 51.23% | -15.88% |