PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NML vs. NXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NML vs. NXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NML achieves a 18.43% return, which is significantly lower than NXG's 24.88% return.


NML

1D
0.94%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
18.43%
6M
20.71%
1Y
19.19%
3Y*
25.74%
5Y*
22.78%
10Y*
9.69%

NXG

1D
1.21%
1M
4.07%
YTD
24.88%
6M
26.97%
1Y
38.01%
3Y*
35.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NML vs. NXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NML
Neuberger Berman MLP
18.43%4.36%40.55%14.61%-2.77%
NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
24.88%25.98%51.16%4.54%-4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between NML and NXG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022

0.44

The correlation between NML and NXG shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NML vs. NXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NML
NML Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NML Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NML Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NML Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NML Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NXG
NXG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NML vs. NXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMLNXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.90

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

7.89

-2.49

NML vs. NXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NML Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the NXG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NML and NXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NML vs. NXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NML drawdown since its inception was -90.48%, which is greater than NXG's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NML and NXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMLNXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.48%

-26.14%

-64.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-13.19%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-26.14%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.87%

-0.54%

-7.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.96%

-6.54%

-30.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

4.83%

-1.26%

Volatility

NML vs. NXG - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) at 5.17%. This indicates that NML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMLNXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

5.17%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

13.84%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

19.41%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.80%

26.77%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.11%

26.77%

+8.34%

NML vs. NXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NML has a 2.72% expense ratio, which is higher than NXG's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NML vs. NXG - Dividend Comparison

NML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, less than NXG's 11.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NML
Neuberger Berman MLP
7.60%8.24%7.94%10.19%4.26%3.54%8.33%9.76%9.87%7.04%8.63%15.44%
NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
11.01%12.83%14.15%12.00%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NML and NXG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NML has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to NXG (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NML dropped -90.48% vs NXG's -26.14%.

NXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NML and NXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer