MLPR vs. FBGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) and FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds from UBS - MLPR tracks the Alerian MLP Index (150%) while FBGX tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPR charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for FBGX.

Performance

MLPR vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MLPR

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 29.81%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 32.14%
• 5Y*: 26.89%
• 10Y*: —

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPR vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	29.81%	9.83%	31.57%	35.87%	41.04%	57.33%	-9.51%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	35.73%	83.74%	-56.41%	57.04%	59.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPR and FBGX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.23

The correlation between MLPR and FBGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLPR vs. FBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPR

MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 44
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPR vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPR	FBGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPR	FBGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPR	FBGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.07%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.94%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLPR	FBGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.64%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.52%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.75%	—	—

MLPR vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPR vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	9.00%	10.85%	9.57%	10.08%	7.49%	10.69%	4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPR and FBGX in my portfolio?

MLPR and FBGX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPR or FBGX?

On fees, MLPR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPR or FBGX?

MLPR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPR or FBGX?

MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 9.00%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.

What is the main difference between MLPR and FBGX?

MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%), while FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MLPR and 1.29% for FBGX.