PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
FBGX vs. BPTRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FBGX vs. BPTRX

Last updated May 21, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX).

FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014. BPTRX is managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc.. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FBGX or BPTRX.

Correlation

The correlation between FBGX and BPTRX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FBGX vs. BPTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

FBGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BPTRX

YTD

-5.63%

1M

20.23%

6M

7.51%

1Y

40.05%

3Y*

15.87%

5Y*

26.92%

10Y*

19.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

Baron Partners Fund

FBGX vs. BPTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BPTRX's 1.36% expense ratio.

BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBGX vs. BPTRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FBGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGX is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGX is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
BPTRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BPTRX is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BPTRX is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BPTRX is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BPTRX is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BPTRX is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BPTRX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBGX vs. BPTRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Loading data...

Dividends

FBGX vs. BPTRX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBGX nor BPTRX has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.35%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBGX vs. BPTRX - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

FBGX vs. BPTRX - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...