MLPR vs. BDCZ
MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) and BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%), while BDCZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MLPR returned 31.23%/yr vs 3.98%/yr for BDCZ. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MLPR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BDCZ.
Performance
MLPR vs. BDCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 39.50% return, which is significantly higher than BDCZ's -6.58% return.
MLPR
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 25.11%
- YTD
- 39.50%
- 1Y
- 39.67%
- 3Y*
- 31.28%
- 5Y*
- 31.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 32.46%
BDCZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- -10.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.15K | $28.17K | $19.88K | |
| $34.92K | $44.03K | $37.73K |
MLPR vs. BDCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 39.50% | 9.83% | 31.57% | 35.87% | 41.04% | 57.33% | -7.10% |
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | -6.58% | -3.72% | 12.22% | 25.31% | -9.12% | 33.97% | 19.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPR and BDCZ is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MLPR and BDCZ has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPR vs. BDCZ — Risk / Return Rank
MLPR
BDCZ
MLPR vs. BDCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPR | BDCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.93 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | -0.69 | +3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | -1.24 | +8.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPR vs. BDCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum BDCZ drawdown of -55.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and BDCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPR | BDCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | -55.63% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.31% | -16.80% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.45% | -20.77% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.66% | -23.12% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -16.01% | +15.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -7.98% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 9.36% | -4.01% |
Volatility
MLPR vs. BDCZ - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) at 5.90%. This indicates that MLPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPR | BDCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | 5.90% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.18% | 18.49% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.38% | 22.56% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.11% | 18.27% | +10.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.66% | 21.96% | +11.70% |
MLPR vs. BDCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BDCZ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPR vs. BDCZ - Dividend Comparison
MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, less than BDCZ's 12.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | 12.12% | 10.65% | 9.26% | 9.13% | 9.39% | 7.49% | 10.01% | 8.40% | 9.66% | 8.74% | 7.98% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 8.83% | 10.85% | 9.57% | 10.08% | 7.49% | 10.69% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPR and BDCZ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPR has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to BDCZ (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPR dropped -48.98% vs BDCZ's -55.63%.
On 5-year performance, MLPR leads with 31.23% vs 3.98% for BDCZ. On fees, BDCZ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BDCZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPR has performed better with a 31.23% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BDCZ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.
BDCZ has the higher dividend yield at 12.12%, compared with 8.83% for MLPR.
MLPR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BDCZ is Financials Equities. MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%), while BDCZ tracks BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MLPR and 0.85% for BDCZ.
MLPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPR and BDCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer