PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPR vs. MLPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPR vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 39.50% return, which is significantly higher than MLPB's 26.62% return.


MLPR

1D
1.62%
1M
11.14%
6M
25.11%
YTD
39.50%
1Y
39.67%
3Y*
31.28%
5Y*
31.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
32.46%

MLPB

1D
1.16%
1M
7.18%
6M
17.75%
YTD
26.62%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
22.18%
10Y*
8.89%
ALL TIME*
7.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$90.23K$111.55K$133.00K
$34.92K$44.03K$37.73K

MLPR vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
39.50%9.83%31.57%35.87%41.04%57.33%-7.10%
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
26.62%7.40%25.53%22.01%30.22%39.42%-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPR and MLPB is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020

0.96

The correlation between MLPR and MLPB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPR vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPR
MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPB
MLPB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MLPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPR vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPRMLPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.56

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

6.82

+0.43

MLPR vs. MLPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the MLPB Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPR and MLPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPR vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and MLPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPRMLPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.98%

-71.93%

+22.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.31%

-9.28%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.45%

-16.49%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.66%

-20.41%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-14.67%

+5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

3.72%

+1.63%

Volatility

MLPR vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) at 4.65%. This indicates that MLPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPRMLPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

4.65%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.18%

11.14%

+6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.38%

14.17%

+8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.11%

19.62%

+9.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.66%

27.20%

+6.46%

MLPR vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPR vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison

MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, more than MLPB's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
5.70%6.51%5.95%6.37%6.00%6.98%11.93%7.98%8.11%7.23%6.85%
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
8.83%10.85%9.57%10.08%7.49%10.69%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MLPR and MLPB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLPR has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to MLPB (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPR dropped -48.98% vs MLPB's -71.93%.

On 5-year performance, MLPR leads with 31.23% vs 22.18% for MLPB. On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MLPB has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MLPR has performed better with a 31.23% return vs 22.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.

MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 8.83%, compared with 5.70% for MLPB.

MLPR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MLPB is Infrastructure Equities. MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%), while MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MLPR and 0.85% for MLPB.

MLPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPR and MLPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer