PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FBGX vs. MSEQX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBGX and MSEQX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FBGX vs. MSEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
51.46%
FBGX
MSEQX

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


FBGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MSEQX

YTD

6.48%

1M

2.51%

6M

51.46%

1Y

67.34%

5Y*

3.86%

10Y*

4.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBGX vs. MSEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEQX's 0.56% expense ratio.


FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
Expense ratio chart for FBGX: current value at 1.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.29%
Expense ratio chart for MSEQX: current value at 0.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.56%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBGX vs. MSEQX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGX is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGX is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MSEQX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSEQX is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSEQX is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSEQX is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSEQX is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSEQX is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSEQX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBGX vs. MSEQX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.862.47
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.893.12
The chart of Omega ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.551.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.810.97
The chart of Martin ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 12.96, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.9611.90
FBGX
MSEQX


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.86
2.47
FBGX
MSEQX

Dividends

FBGX vs. MSEQX - Dividend Comparison

FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.52%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

FBGX vs. MSEQX - Drawdown Comparison


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.14%
-47.63%
FBGX
MSEQX

Volatility

FBGX vs. MSEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) is 0.00%, while Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that FBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
9.77%
FBGX
MSEQX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab