MLPR vs. KRBN
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN).
MLPR and KRBN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. KRBN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2020. Both MLPR and KRBN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MLPR or KRBN.
Key characteristics
| MLPR | KRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.54% | -9.32% |
| 1Y Return | 53.54% | -7.63% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 31.50% | 5.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.85 | -0.33 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.12% | 23.07% |
| Max Drawdown | -48.98% | -36.42% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.09% | -22.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPR and KRBN is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MLPR vs. KRBN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly higher than KRBN's -9.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPR vs. KRBN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KRBN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MLPR vs. KRBN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MLPR vs. KRBN - Dividend Comparison
MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, more than KRBN's 8.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.52% | 10.08% | 10.07% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF | 8.38% | 7.60% | 22.91% | 0.49% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLPR vs. KRBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than KRBN's maximum drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and KRBN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MLPR vs. KRBN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) is 6.91%, while KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that MLPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.