PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FBGX vs. MS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FBGXMS

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between FBGX and MS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FBGX vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.48%
33.86%
FBGX
MS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBGX vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 3.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 19.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0019.13
MS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MS, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MS, currently valued at 4.02, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MS, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.57
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MS, currently valued at 3.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MS, currently valued at 17.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0017.52

FBGX vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.59
3.07
FBGX
MS

Dividends

FBGX vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.68%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%0.90%0.64%

Drawdowns

FBGX vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.14%
-0.91%
FBGX
MS

Volatility

FBGX vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) is 0.00%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 13.83%. This indicates that FBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
13.83%
FBGX
MS