MLPAX vs. NML
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML).
MLPAX is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Mar 31, 2010. NML is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 26, 2013.
Performance
MLPAX vs. NML - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPAX vs. NML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPAX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A | 17.20% | 4.31% | 40.77% | 20.43% | 29.07% | 39.45% | -30.58% | 5.60% | -15.05% | -7.22% |
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 25.95% | 4.36% | 40.55% | 14.61% | 32.75% | 61.76% | -45.84% | 10.60% | -23.02% | 7.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPAX achieves a 17.20% return, which is significantly lower than NML's 25.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPAX has underperformed NML with an annualized return of 10.84%, while NML has yielded a comparatively higher 12.90% annualized return.
MLPAX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 17.20%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 14.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 25.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
NML
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 25.95%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 28.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPAX vs. NML - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPAX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than NML's 2.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPAX vs. NML — Risk / Return Rank
MLPAX
NML
MLPAX vs. NML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPAX | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.22 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.60 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.66 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 5.64 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPAX | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.22 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.37 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.08 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPAX and NML is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLPAX vs. NML - Dividend Comparison
MLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than NML's 6.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPAX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A | 5.07% | 5.72% | 5.00% | 5.91% | 6.56% | 7.91% | 14.02% | 9.91% | 10.40% | 8.21% | 7.34% | 7.99% |
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 6.67% | 8.24% | 7.94% | 10.19% | 4.26% | 3.54% | 8.33% | 9.76% | 9.87% | 7.04% | 8.63% | 15.44% |
Drawdowns
MLPAX vs. NML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPAX drawdown since its inception was -77.51%, smaller than the maximum NML drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPAX and NML.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPAX | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.51% | -90.48% | +12.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -15.72% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.04% | -21.40% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.85% | -84.84% | +11.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.66% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -37.54% | +20.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 4.62% | +0.73% |
Volatility
MLPAX vs. NML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) is 3.07%, while Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that MLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPAX | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 4.14% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 12.52% | -4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 21.79% | -5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 23.88% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 35.35% | -9.22% |