PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPAX vs. MLPDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPAX vs. MLPDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPAX achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly lower than MLPDX's 23.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPAX has underperformed MLPDX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while MLPDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.


MLPAX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.40%
6M
14.75%
YTD
21.63%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
23.55%
10Y*
9.05%
ALL TIME*
7.33%

MLPDX

1D
0.29%
1M
3.99%
6M
15.17%
YTD
23.53%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
10.35%
ALL TIME*
7.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MLPAX vs. MLPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
21.63%4.31%40.77%20.43%29.07%39.45%-30.58%5.60%-15.05%-7.22%
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
23.53%7.69%24.00%20.32%25.11%44.69%-25.75%18.07%-13.12%-8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPAX and MLPDX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010

0.94

The correlation between MLPAX and MLPDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPAX vs. MLPDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPAX
MLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPDX
MLPDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MLPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPAX vs. MLPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPAXMLPDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

3.44

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

9.96

-0.65

MLPAX vs. MLPDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the MLPDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPAX and MLPDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPAX vs. MLPDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPAX drawdown since its inception was -77.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPDX drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPAX and MLPDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPAXMLPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.51%

-77.09%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.92%

-7.51%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-14.45%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-17.98%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.85%

-72.90%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.36%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-13.30%

-3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.59%

-0.15%

Volatility

MLPAX vs. MLPDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) is 3.93%, while Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that MLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPAXMLPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.27%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

9.78%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

12.38%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

17.04%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

25.73%

+0.24%

MLPAX vs. MLPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPAX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPDX's 9.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPAX vs. MLPDX - Dividend Comparison

MLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, less than MLPDX's 6.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
5.14%5.72%5.00%5.91%6.56%7.91%14.02%9.91%10.40%8.21%7.34%7.99%
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
6.54%7.51%6.42%7.72%8.49%9.74%17.44%17.48%13.70%10.99%10.00%11.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MLPAX and MLPDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLPDX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to MLPAX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPAX dropped -77.51% vs MLPDX's -77.09%.

MLPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPAX and MLPDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer