MLPAX vs. MLPFX
MLPAX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A) and MLPFX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A) are both MLPs funds from Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPAX returned 8.56%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for MLPFX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MLPAX charges 1.54%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for MLPFX.
Performance
MLPAX vs. MLPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPAX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than MLPFX's 21.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPAX has underperformed MLPFX with an annualized return of 8.56%, while MLPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.11% annualized return.
MLPAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 16.16%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 25.76%
- 5Y*
- 20.77%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
MLPFX
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- 21.35%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 26.14%
- 5Y*
- 20.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
MLPAX vs. MLPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPAX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A | 16.16% | 4.31% | 40.77% | 20.43% | 29.07% | 39.45% | -30.58% | 5.60% | -15.05% | -7.22% |
MLPFX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A | 21.35% | 8.22% | 29.99% | 22.47% | 21.84% | 39.44% | -25.43% | 6.90% | -9.63% | -4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPAX and MLPFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between MLPAX and MLPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPAX vs. MLPFX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPAX
MLPFX
MLPAX vs. MLPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPAX | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.32 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.31 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 10.22 | -2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPAX vs. MLPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPAX drawdown since its inception was -77.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPFX drawdown of -76.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPAX and MLPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPAX | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.51% | -76.01% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | -7.40% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -14.55% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.04% | -18.81% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.85% | -72.18% | -0.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.32% | -6.08% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.01% | -13.05% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.39% | -0.01% |
Volatility
MLPAX vs. MLPFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) is 4.21%, while Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that MLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPAX | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.71% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 9.42% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.40% | 12.75% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 17.73% | +1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.98% | 25.08% | +0.90% |
MLPAX vs. MLPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPAX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPFX's 10.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPAX vs. MLPFX - Dividend Comparison
MLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, which matches MLPFX's 5.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPAX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A | 5.31% | 5.72% | 5.00% | 5.91% | 6.56% | 7.91% | 14.02% | 9.91% | 10.40% | 8.21% | 7.34% | 7.99% |
MLPFX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A | 5.35% | 6.11% | 5.29% | 6.54% | 7.34% | 8.29% | 13.36% | 10.42% | 10.09% | 8.35% | 7.41% | 7.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, MLPAX and MLPFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MLPFX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to MLPAX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPAX dropped -77.51% vs MLPFX's -76.01%.
MLPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPAX and MLPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer