PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPAX vs. TYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPAX vs. TYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPAX achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly higher than TYG's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPAX has outperformed TYG with an annualized return of 9.05%, while TYG has yielded a comparatively lower -1.12% annualized return.


MLPAX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.40%
6M
14.75%
YTD
21.63%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
23.55%
10Y*
9.05%
ALL TIME*
7.33%

TYG

1D
0.16%
1M
1.30%
6M
2.29%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
11.58%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
21.21%
10Y*
-1.12%
ALL TIME*
4.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$5.92M$6.80M$9.17M

MLPAX vs. TYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
21.63%4.31%40.77%20.43%29.07%39.45%-30.58%5.60%-15.05%-7.22%
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
12.60%8.46%60.18%-0.37%24.20%46.86%-70.31%1.79%-24.74%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPAX and TYG is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPAX and TYG has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPAX vs. TYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPAX
MLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TYG
TYG Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPAX vs. TYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPAXTYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

0.83

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

1.92

+7.39

MLPAX vs. TYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the TYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPAX and TYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPAX vs. TYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPAX drawdown since its inception was -77.51%, smaller than the maximum TYG drawdown of -95.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPAX and TYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPAXTYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.51%

-95.34%

+17.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.92%

-13.94%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-25.08%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-25.08%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.85%

-94.98%

+22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-35.77%

+34.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-29.46%

+12.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

5.99%

-3.55%

Volatility

MLPAX vs. TYG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) have volatilities of 3.93% and 4.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPAXTYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.06%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

16.27%

-7.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

19.40%

-7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

23.56%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

51.09%

-25.12%

MLPAX vs. TYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPAX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than TYG's 2.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPAX vs. TYG - Dividend Comparison

MLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, less than TYG's 12.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
5.14%5.72%5.00%5.91%6.56%7.91%14.02%9.91%10.40%8.21%7.34%7.99%
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
12.52%11.25%7.96%9.87%8.94%5.27%10.85%14.61%13.17%9.01%8.54%13.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPAX and TYG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYG has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to MLPAX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPAX dropped -77.51% vs TYG's -95.34%.

MLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPAX and TYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer