MLI vs. PBF
MLI (Mueller Industries, Inc.) and PBF (PBF Energy Inc.) are both stocks. MLI operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while PBF operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy). Over the past 10 years, MLI returned 26.81%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for PBF. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLI vs. PBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLI achieves a 20.99% return, which is significantly lower than PBF's 56.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MLI has outperformed PBF with an annualized return of 26.81%, while PBF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.57% annualized return.
MLI
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 20.99%
- 6M
- 21.99%
- 1Y
- 87.91%
- 3Y*
- 51.41%
- 5Y*
- 44.58%
- 10Y*
- 26.81%
PBF
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 56.73%
- 6M
- 40.01%
- 1Y
- 104.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
MLI vs. PBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLI Mueller Industries, Inc. | 20.99% | 46.29% | 70.51% | 62.38% | 1.05% | 70.95% | 12.30% | 37.79% | -33.10% | -2.76% |
PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 56.73% | 6.75% | -37.99% | 9.97% | 215.81% | 82.68% | -77.12% | 0.16% | -4.93% | 33.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLI and PBF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2012 | 0.30 |
The correlation between MLI and PBF shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MLI:
$10.18
PBF:
$3.74
MLI:
13.57
PBF:
11.20
MLI:
0.88
PBF:
0.04
MLI:
2.63
PBF:
0.16
MLI:
$4.37B
PBF:
$30.17B
MLI:
$871.92M
PBF:
$127.70M
MLI:
$1.03B
PBF:
$812.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLI vs. PBF — Risk / Return Rank
MLI
PBF
MLI vs. PBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) and PBF Energy Inc. (PBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLI | PBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 3.12 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.31 | 6.88 | +3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLI vs. PBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLI drawdown since its inception was -61.72%, smaller than the maximum PBF drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLI and PBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLI | PBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.72% | -91.51% | +29.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.33% | -34.86% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.79% | -76.04% | +48.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.79% | -76.04% | +48.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.95% | -91.51% | +38.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -26.86% | +25.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.04% | -37.87% | +21.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.05% | 15.77% | -7.72% |
Volatility
MLI vs. PBF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) is 10.51%, while PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) has a volatility of 14.54%. This indicates that MLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLI | PBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | 14.54% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.80% | 47.59% | -21.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.28% | 64.62% | -34.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 60.52% | -27.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.77% | 67.23% | -31.46% |
Dividends
MLI vs. PBF - Dividend Comparison
MLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than PBF's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLI Mueller Industries, Inc. | 0.87% | 0.87% | 1.01% | 1.27% | 1.69% | 0.88% | 1.14% | 1.26% | 1.71% | 9.60% | 0.94% | 1.11% |
PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 2.63% | 4.06% | 3.86% | 1.93% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 4.23% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 3.39% | 4.30% | 3.26% |
Financials
MLI vs. PBF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mueller Industries, Inc. and PBF Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MLI vs. PBF - Profitability Comparison
MLI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 278.50M and revenue of 7.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.
MLI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 312.23M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
PBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 299.60M and revenue of 7.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
MLI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 239.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.
PBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a net income of 198.30M and revenue of 7.90B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLI and PBF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBF has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to MLI (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLI dropped -61.72% vs PBF's -91.51%.
MLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLI and PBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer