PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLI vs. WLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MLI vs. WLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) and Westlake Corporation (WLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLI achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than WLK's 18.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MLI has outperformed WLK with an annualized return of 26.21%, while WLK has yielded a comparatively lower 8.45% annualized return.


MLI

1D
3.37%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
14.10%
6M
18.54%
1Y
70.66%
3Y*
50.83%
5Y*
43.31%
10Y*
26.21%

WLK

1D
0.52%
1M
-24.04%
YTD
18.73%
6M
31.81%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
-6.60%
5Y*
-2.14%
10Y*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLI vs. WLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
14.10%46.29%70.51%62.38%1.05%70.95%12.30%37.79%-33.10%-2.76%
WLK
Westlake Corporation
18.73%-33.77%-16.90%38.23%6.81%20.53%18.52%7.72%-37.27%92.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MLI and WLK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2004

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between MLI and WLK has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

MLI:

$10.18

WLK:

-$12.75

PS Ratio

MLI:

2.49

WLK:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLI:

$4.37B

WLK:

$10.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLI:

$871.92M

WLK:

$169.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

MLI:

$1.03B

WLK:

-$659.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLI vs. WLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLI
MLI Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLI Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

WLK
WLK Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
WLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLI vs. WLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) and Westlake Corporation (WLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLIWLKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.36

0.59

+1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

1.20

+1.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.13

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

0.67

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.65

1.77

+6.89

MLI vs. WLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLI Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the WLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLI and WLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLIWLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

0.59

+1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.32

-0.06

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.22

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.32

+0.16

Drawdowns

MLI vs. WLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLI drawdown since its inception was -61.72%, smaller than the maximum WLK drawdown of -75.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLI and WLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLIWLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.72%

-75.16%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.33%

-37.77%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-64.20%

+36.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

-64.20%

+36.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.95%

-75.16%

+22.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.29%

-43.77%

+36.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.05%

-26.20%

+10.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.04%

14.42%

-6.38%

Volatility

MLI vs. WLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) is 11.12%, while Westlake Corporation (WLK) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that MLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLIWLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.12%

13.02%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.74%

33.02%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.11%

47.19%

-17.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.04%

36.98%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.77%

39.38%

-3.61%

Dividends

MLI vs. WLK - Dividend Comparison

MLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than WLK's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
0.84%0.87%1.01%1.27%1.69%0.88%1.14%1.26%1.71%9.60%0.94%1.11%
WLK
Westlake Corporation
2.44%2.85%1.79%1.12%1.28%1.17%1.31%1.46%1.39%0.75%1.33%1.28%

Financials

MLI vs. WLK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mueller Industries, Inc. and Westlake Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.19B
2.65B
(MLI) Total Revenue
(WLK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MLI vs. WLK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mueller Industries, Inc. and Westlake Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%202220232024202520260
4.2%
Portfolio components
MLI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WLK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westlake Corporation reported a gross profit of 112.00M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.2%.

MLI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 312.23M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

WLK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westlake Corporation reported an operating income of -172.00M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.5%.

MLI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 239.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.

WLK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westlake Corporation reported a net income of -169.00M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MLI and WLK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLK has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to MLI (11.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLI dropped -61.72% vs WLK's -75.16%.

MLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLI and WLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer