MKC vs. KMB
MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — MKC in Packaged Foods, KMB in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, MKC returned 2.06%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for KMB. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MKC vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKC achieves a -21.75% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 9.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MKC has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 2.06%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.33% annualized return.
MKC
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 13.26%
- 6M
- -21.43%
- YTD
- -21.75%
- 1Y
- -23.61%
- 3Y*
- -13.71%
- 5Y*
- -7.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.93%
KMB
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- -10.55%
- 3Y*
- -3.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.88%
MKC vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -21.75% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 9.91% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MKC and KMB is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.35 |
The correlation between MKC and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MKC:
$14.07B
KMB:
$35.87B
MKC:
$6.05
KMB:
$5.93
MKC:
8.66
KMB:
18.23
MKC:
6.30
KMB:
3.15
MKC:
1.91
KMB:
2.18
MKC:
2.01
KMB:
20.05
MKC:
$7.39B
KMB:
$16.54B
MKC:
$2.85B
KMB:
$5.93B
MKC:
$1.37B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKC vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
MKC
KMB
MKC vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MKC | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.95 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.36 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | -0.53 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MKC vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKC drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKC and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKC | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -36.97% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.93% | -29.60% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.65% | -34.06% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.02% | -34.06% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.02% | -34.06% | -17.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.42% | -22.38% | -22.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -8.88% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.76% | 20.13% | -1.37% |
Volatility
MKC vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) has a higher volatility of 11.85% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.94%. This indicates that MKC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MKC | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.85% | 8.94% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.45% | 18.50% | +6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.68% | 26.96% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 20.56% | +4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 21.22% | +3.22% |
Dividends
MKC vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than KMB's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.70% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.61% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
Financials
MKC vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MKC vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
MKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 778.20M and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
MKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 276.40M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
MKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 160.20M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MKC and KMB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MKC has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to KMB (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKC dropped -52.02% vs KMB's -36.97%.
KMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MKC and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer