MKC vs. KMB
MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — MKC in Packaged Foods, KMB in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, MKC returned 1.82%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MKC vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKC achieves a -27.49% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MKC has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 1.82%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.
MKC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- -27.49%
- 6M
- -25.55%
- 1Y
- -33.55%
- 3Y*
- -16.44%
- 5Y*
- -9.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -19.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
MKC vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -27.49% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MKC and KMB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.35 |
The correlation between MKC and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MKC:
$13.19B
KMB:
$34.08B
MKC:
$6.10
KMB:
$5.93
MKC:
8.02
KMB:
17.26
MKC:
5.83
KMB:
2.98
MKC:
1.85
KMB:
2.06
MKC:
1.89
KMB:
18.98
MKC:
$7.11B
KMB:
$16.54B
MKC:
$2.70B
KMB:
$5.93B
MKC:
$1.22B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKC vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
MKC
KMB
MKC vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MKC | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.87 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.67 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | -1.03 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MKC vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKC drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKC and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKC | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -36.97% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.50% | -29.60% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.65% | -34.06% | -13.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.02% | -34.06% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.02% | -34.06% | -17.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.49% | -26.52% | -21.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -8.85% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.92% | 19.43% | +0.49% |
Volatility
MKC vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is 6.12%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that MKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MKC | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 8.42% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.28% | 16.67% | +6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.06% | 25.77% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 20.19% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 21.07% | +3.10% |
Dividends
MKC vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.80% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
Financials
MKC vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MKC vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
MKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
MKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
MKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MKC and KMB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to MKC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKC dropped -52.02% vs KMB's -36.97%.
KMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MKC and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer