MISL vs. CIBR
MISL (First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MISL is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MISL returned 28.35%/yr vs 28.32%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
MISL vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.
MISL
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 32.38%
- 3Y*
- 28.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
MISL vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 7.59% | 41.24% | 20.48% | 14.78% | 8.22% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -4.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MISL and CIBR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.45 |
The correlation between MISL and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MISL vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MISL
CIBR
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
MISL
CIBR
Technology
MISL
CIBR
Basic Materials
MISL
-
CIBR
-
Communication Services
MISL
-
CIBR
Consumer Cyclical
MISL
-
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
MISL
-
CIBR
-
Energy
MISL
-
CIBR
-
Financial Services
MISL
-
CIBR
-
Healthcare
MISL
-
CIBR
-
Real Estate
MISL
-
CIBR
-
Utilities
MISL
-
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MISL vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
MISL
CIBR
MISL vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MISL | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.18 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 2.79 | +2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MISL | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.06 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.67 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
MISL vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MISL | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -33.89% | +15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.69% | -21.99% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -21.99% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.75% | -2.81% | -6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -8.66% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 9.25% | -3.34% |
Volatility
MISL vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) is 8.50%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that MISL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MISL | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 10.90% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.14% | 20.90% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.60% | 24.50% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 24.95% | -5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 23.60% | -4.46% |
MISL vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MISL and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
MISL vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 0.74% | 0.63% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MISL and CIBR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to MISL (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISL dropped -17.91% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 3-year performance, MISL leads with 28.35% vs 28.32% for CIBR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, MISL has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MISL has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 28.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MISL and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.36% for MISL.
MISL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. MISL tracks Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.
MISL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MISL and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer