MISL vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MISL (First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MISL is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MISL returned 26.09%/yr vs 21.36%/yr for VOO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MISL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

MISL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return.

MISL

• 1D: -3.99%
• 1M: -4.32%
• YTD: 4.18%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 25.39%
• 3Y*: 26.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.30%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MISL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF	4.18%	41.24%	20.48%	14.78%	8.22%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	9.75%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MISL and VOO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022	0.58

The correlation between MISL and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

MISL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MISL	VOO
Industrials	82.2%	7.6%
Technology	17.8%	39.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.2%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

MISL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISL

MISL Risk / Return Rank: 30
MISL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MISL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MISL Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MISL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MISL Martin Ratio Rank: 30

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MISL	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	2.17	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.93	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.39	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	3.02	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	13.58	-9.52

MISL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISL Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MISL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MISL	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.91%	-33.99%	+16.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.69%	-8.90%	-6.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.91%	-18.69%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.61%	-1.74%	-10.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.57%	-3.68%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.26%	1.98%	+4.28%

Volatility

MISL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that MISL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MISL	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.32%	4.60%	+5.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.35%	9.73%	+10.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.94%	12.39%	+11.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.51%	16.90%	+2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.51%	18.05%	+1.46%

MISL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MISL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.37%	0.40%	0.74%	0.63%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MISL and VOO in my portfolio?

MISL and VOO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MISL or VOO?

MISL has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISL dropped -17.91% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, MISL or VOO?

On 3-year performance, MISL leads with 26.09% vs 21.36% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MISL or VOO?

Over the 3-year period, MISL has performed better with a 26.09% return vs 21.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MISL or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for MISL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MISL or VOO?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.37% for MISL.

What is the main difference between MISL and VOO?

MISL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MISL tracks Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MISL and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.