GTSGX vs. VLIFX
GTSGX (Madison Mid Cap Fund) and VLIFX (Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund) are both mutual funds - GTSGX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Madison Funds, while VLIFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Value Line. Over the past 10 years, GTSGX returned 10.89%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for VLIFX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTSGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for VLIFX.
Performance
GTSGX vs. VLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTSGX achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly higher than VLIFX's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GTSGX has underperformed VLIFX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while VLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.63% annualized return.
GTSGX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
VLIFX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 0.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.31%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
GTSGX vs. VLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTSGX Madison Mid Cap Fund | 3.85% | 1.62% | 10.24% | 26.51% | -13.60% | 26.31% | 9.45% | 33.53% | -1.60% | 15.65% |
VLIFX Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund | 1.39% | 0.79% | 7.59% | 22.11% | -9.60% | 19.76% | 19.96% | 35.30% | 4.65% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTSGX and VLIFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990 | 0.81 |
The correlation between GTSGX and VLIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTSGX vs. VLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GTSGX
VLIFX
GTSGX vs. VLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTSGX | VLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.01 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.03 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | -0.08 | +0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTSGX vs. VLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTSGX drawdown since its inception was -73.82%, which is greater than VLIFX's maximum drawdown of -61.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSGX and VLIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTSGX | VLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.82% | -61.48% | -12.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.99% | -11.81% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -17.66% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.94% | -21.91% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.25% | -35.51% | -2.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -6.20% | +3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.61% | -15.64% | -13.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 4.34% | +0.77% |
Volatility
GTSGX vs. VLIFX - Volatility Comparison
Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX) at 2.91%. This indicates that GTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTSGX | VLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 2.91% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 10.05% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 13.50% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 16.87% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 17.81% | +0.23% |
GTSGX vs. VLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTSGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than VLIFX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTSGX vs. VLIFX - Dividend Comparison
GTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than VLIFX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTSGX Madison Mid Cap Fund | 3.24% | 3.37% | 5.76% | 1.25% | 1.96% | 4.38% | 3.43% | 3.74% | 7.57% | 3.58% | 4.34% | 6.09% |
VLIFX Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund | 2.13% | 2.16% | 0.99% | 0.03% | 7.22% | 8.23% | 7.81% | 1.42% | 5.12% | 1.61% | 2.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTSGX and VLIFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTSGX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to VLIFX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTSGX dropped -73.82% vs VLIFX's -61.48%.
GTSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTSGX and VLIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer