GTSGX vs. XMMO

In the year-to-date period, GTSGX achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's -7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, GTSGX has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 5.71%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GTSGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GTSGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTSGX and XMMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than XMMO's 0.54% yield.

The maximum GTSGX drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSGX and XMMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) is 12.53%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 14.77%. This indicates that GTSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.