MIG vs. IBDR
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR).
MIG and IBDR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MIG is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI). It was launched on Dec 1, 2020. IBDR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2016. Both MIG and IBDR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MIG vs. IBDR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIG vs. IBDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF | -0.30% | 7.34% | 3.38% | 8.88% | -14.51% | -0.02% | 1.26% |
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 0.72% | 4.99% | 4.98% | 5.96% | -8.28% | -1.79% | 0.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIG achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than IBDR's 0.72% return.
MIG
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
IBDR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIG vs. IBDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MIG vs. IBDR — Risk / Return Rank
MIG
IBDR
MIG vs. IBDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIG | IBDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 5.39 | -4.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 9.54 | -8.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 2.66 | -1.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 11.93 | -10.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 82.60 | -77.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIG | IBDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 5.39 | -4.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.48 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.60 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIG and IBDR is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIG vs. IBDR - Dividend Comparison
MIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than IBDR's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF | 4.79% | 4.81% | 4.68% | 4.38% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 4.18% | 4.20% | 4.13% | 3.41% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.61% | 3.25% | 3.56% | 3.22% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
MIG vs. IBDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIG drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than IBDR's maximum drawdown of -16.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIG and IBDR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIG | IBDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -16.06% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -0.37% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.98% | -13.13% | -7.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | 0.00% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -2.89% | -4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.05% | +0.92% |
Volatility
MIG vs. IBDR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) at 0.15%. This indicates that MIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIG | IBDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 0.15% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.99% | 0.38% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.08% | 0.82% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.34% | 3.43% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 4.91% | +1.36% |