MIG vs. IGEB
MIG (VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF) and IGEB (iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - MIG tracks the MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI) while IGEB tracks the BlackRock Investment Grade Enhanced Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIG returned 0.97%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for IGEB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MIG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IGEB.
Performance
MIG vs. IGEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIG achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than IGEB's 0.41% return.
MIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
IGEB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
MIG vs. IGEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF | 0.39% | 7.34% | 3.38% | 8.88% | -14.51% | -0.02% | 1.26% |
IGEB iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF | 0.41% | 8.17% | 3.10% | 9.56% | -14.85% | -1.14% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIG and IGEB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between MIG and IGEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIG vs. IGEB — Risk / Return Rank
MIG
IGEB
MIG vs. IGEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIG | IGEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.12 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.08 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 6.81 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIG | IGEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.17 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.49 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
MIG vs. IGEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIG drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, roughly equal to the maximum IGEB drawdown of -21.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIG and IGEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIG | IGEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -21.13% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -2.88% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.61% | -5.97% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.98% | -21.13% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -1.03% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -4.90% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.88% | +0.15% |
Volatility
MIG vs. IGEB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) at 1.33%. This indicates that MIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIG | IGEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 1.33% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 3.07% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26% | 4.16% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 6.70% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 6.52% | -0.30% |
MIG vs. IGEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IGEB's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MIG vs. IGEB - Dividend Comparison
MIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than IGEB's 5.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGEB iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF | 5.06% | 4.92% | 5.09% | 4.60% | 3.64% | 3.84% | 3.78% | 5.61% | 3.59% | 1.62% |
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF | 4.78% | 4.81% | 4.68% | 4.38% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MIG and IGEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MIG has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to IGEB (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIG dropped -20.98% vs IGEB's -21.13%.
On 5-year performance, IGEB leads with 1.10% vs 0.97% for MIG. On fees, IGEB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IGEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGEB has performed better with a 1.10% return vs 0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGEB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MIG.
IGEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 4.78% for MIG.
MIG tracks MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI), while IGEB tracks BlackRock Investment Grade Enhanced Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MIG and 0.18% for IGEB.
IGEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIG and IGEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer