MIG vs. GABF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MIG (VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI), while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. MIG is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MIG returned 5.64%/yr vs 20.47%/yr for GABF. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

MIG vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIG achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -7.03% return.

MIG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: -0.01%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: 5.64%
• 5Y*: 0.97%
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: -3.11%
• YTD: -7.03%
• 6M: -6.24%
• 1Y: -3.20%
• 3Y*: 20.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIG vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF	0.39%	7.34%	3.38%	8.88%	-2.13%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-7.03%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MIG and GABF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022	0.29

Return for Risk

MIG vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIG

MIG Risk / Return Rank: 36
MIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MIG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MIG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 7
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIG vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIG	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	-0.19	+1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	-0.13	+1.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.98	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	-0.19	+2.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	-0.44	+5.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIG vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIG and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIG	GABF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	-0.19	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.87	-0.72

Drawdowns

MIG vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIG drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, roughly equal to the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIG and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIG	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.98%	-20.86%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.83%	-17.16%	+14.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.61%	-20.86%	+15.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-11.60%	+10.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.81%	-4.86%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	7.27%	-6.24%

Volatility

MIG vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) is 1.47%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that MIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIG	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	4.28%	-2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	13.14%	-10.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.26%	17.37%	-13.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.35%	20.54%	-14.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.22%	20.54%	-14.32%

MIG vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MIG vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

MIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than GABF's 2.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.11%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF	4.78%	4.81%	4.68%	4.38%	3.06%	2.15%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIG and GABF in my portfolio?

MIG and GABF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIG or GABF?

GABF has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to MIG (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIG dropped -20.98% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, MIG or GABF?

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 20.47% vs 5.64% for MIG. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, MIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MIG or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 20.47% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MIG or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MIG or GABF?

MIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 2.11% for GABF.

What is the main difference between MIG and GABF?

MIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MIG and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.