PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDU vs. YINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDU vs. YINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 41.54% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -29.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDU has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of 12.76%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -18.37% annualized return.


MIDU

1D
1.98%
1M
10.51%
YTD
41.54%
6M
35.51%
1Y
66.94%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
12.76%

YINN

1D
3.08%
1M
-23.37%
YTD
-29.95%
6M
-32.53%
1Y
-27.68%
3Y*
-6.43%
5Y*
-38.50%
10Y*
-18.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDU vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
41.54%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-29.95%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%129.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and YINN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2009

0.55

The correlation between MIDU and YINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MIDU vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDU
YINN

Industrials

25.0%
2.4%

Technology

15.7%
5.5%

Financial Services

14.4%
34.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
27.4%

Healthcare

8.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

7.5%
1.0%

Energy

5.5%
5.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
0.9%

Utilities

3.1%
0.4%

Communication Services

1.0%
15.7%

Industrials

MIDU
25.0%
YINN
2.4%

Technology

MIDU
15.7%
YINN
5.5%

Financial Services

MIDU
14.4%
YINN
34.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDU
10.7%
YINN
27.4%

Healthcare

MIDU
8.6%
YINN
2.3%

Real Estate

MIDU
7.5%
YINN
1.0%

Energy

MIDU
5.5%
YINN
5.6%

Basic Materials

MIDU
4.8%
YINN
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

MIDU
3.8%
YINN
0.9%

Utilities

MIDU
3.1%
YINN
0.4%

Communication Services

MIDU
1.0%
YINN
15.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDU vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDU vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDUYINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.96

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

-0.56

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

-1.09

+9.74

MIDU vs. YINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the YINN Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and YINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and YINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDUYINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.26%

-98.87%

+12.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-49.61%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.41%

-69.08%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.14%

-96.28%

+32.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.26%

-98.59%

+12.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-97.52%

+96.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.41%

-68.51%

+46.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

25.53%

-17.76%

Volatility

MIDU vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) is 15.07%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a volatility of 18.63%. This indicates that MIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDUYINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.07%

18.63%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.90%

42.54%

-7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.43%

58.74%

-11.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.59%

94.19%

-34.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.65%

81.73%

-18.08%

MIDU vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDU vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than YINN's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.63%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.42%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDU and YINN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YINN has higher volatility (18.63%) compared to MIDU (15.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs YINN's -98.87%.

On 10-year performance, MIDU leads with 12.76% vs -18.37% for YINN. On fees, MIDU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, MIDU has been the lower-risk option at 15.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MIDU has performed better with a 12.76% return vs -18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MIDU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.63% for MIDU.

MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 1.52% for YINN.

MIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDU and YINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer