PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDU vs. SAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDU vs. SAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 34.47% return, which is significantly lower than SAA's 40.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDU has underperformed SAA with an annualized return of 10.70%, while SAA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.


MIDU

1D
-2.52%
1M
-4.35%
6M
13.38%
YTD
34.47%
1Y
43.49%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
10.70%
ALL TIME*
21.76%

SAA

1D
-1.26%
1M
2.42%
6M
23.30%
YTD
40.69%
1Y
58.53%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
11.73%
ALL TIME*
9.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDU vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
34.47%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
40.69%0.29%5.60%21.32%-36.17%51.77%-1.79%42.39%-23.00%23.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and SAA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009

0.89

The correlation between MIDU and SAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIDU vs. SAA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDU
SAA

Industrials

25.3%
15.6%

Technology

17.1%
15.5%

Financial Services

13.9%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
13.2%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.4%

Real Estate

7.3%
7.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.7%

Energy

4.6%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.2%

Utilities

2.9%
1.8%

Communication Services

1.5%
3.2%

Industrials

MIDU
25.3%
SAA
15.6%

Technology

MIDU
17.1%
SAA
15.5%

Financial Services

MIDU
13.9%
SAA
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDU
10.5%
SAA
13.2%

Healthcare

MIDU
8.9%
SAA
12.4%

Real Estate

MIDU
7.3%
SAA
7.6%

Basic Materials

MIDU
4.8%
SAA
4.7%

Energy

MIDU
4.6%
SAA
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

MIDU
3.2%
SAA
4.2%

Utilities

MIDU
2.9%
SAA
1.8%

Communication Services

MIDU
1.5%
SAA
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDU vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SAA
SAA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDU vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDUSAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.23

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

10.51

-4.97

MIDU vs. SAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the SAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and SAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SAA drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and SAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDUSAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.26%

-87.39%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-18.21%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.41%

-50.84%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.14%

-55.37%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.26%

-74.54%

-11.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.11%

-4.54%

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.31%

-27.26%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

5.59%

+2.28%

Volatility

MIDU vs. SAA - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) at 7.48%. This indicates that MIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDUSAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

7.48%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.74%

24.17%

+10.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.11%

35.47%

+11.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.24%

43.28%

+15.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.46%

46.01%

+17.45%

MIDU vs. SAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SAA's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDU vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SAA's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.53%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
0.77%1.05%1.36%0.88%0.46%0.00%0.03%0.35%0.27%0.00%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MIDU and SAA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIDU has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to SAA (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs SAA's -87.39%.

On 10-year performance, SAA leads with 11.73% vs 10.70% for MIDU. On fees, SAA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SAA has been the lower-risk option at 7.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SAA has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SAA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.53% for MIDU.

MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.95% for SAA.

SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDU and SAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer