MIDU vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MIDU (Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MIDU is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MIDU returned 27.63%/yr vs 19.10%/yr for QTJL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIDU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

MIDU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 42.23% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.42% return.

MIDU

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 10.15%
• YTD: 42.23%
• 6M: 33.14%
• 1Y: 73.64%
• 3Y*: 27.63%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 13.35%

QTJL

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 6M: 7.21%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 19.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares	42.23%	-2.75%	20.32%	27.79%	-49.27%	13.44%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.42%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and QTJL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.70

The correlation between MIDU and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MIDU vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MIDU	QTJL
Industrials	5.3%	2.6%
Technology	3.4%	58.0%
Financial Services	2.8%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	2.0%	11.6%
Healthcare	1.8%	3.7%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.1%
Energy	1.0%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	6.6%
Utilities	0.6%	1.2%
Communication Services	0.2%	14.5%

Return for Risk

MIDU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDU

MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 49
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 41
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 56

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 67
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIDU	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.96	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.80	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.40	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.90	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.51	15.29	-5.77

MIDU vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIDU	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.26%	-33.40%	-52.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.80%	-6.68%	-19.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.41%	-22.43%	-37.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	0.00%	-1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.38%	-7.86%	-14.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.76%	1.27%	+6.49%

Volatility

MIDU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a higher volatility of 13.42% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.60%. This indicates that MIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIDU	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.42%	0.60%	+12.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.76%	7.46%	+27.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.36%	9.90%	+37.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.48%	20.32%	+39.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.68%	20.32%	+43.36%

MIDU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIDU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.62%	1.04%	1.10%	1.43%	0.11%	0.00%	0.06%	0.71%	0.70%	2.67%	1.89%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIDU and QTJL in my portfolio?

MIDU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIDU or QTJL?

MIDU has higher volatility (13.42%) compared to QTJL (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, MIDU or QTJL?

On 3-year performance, MIDU leads with 27.63% vs 19.10% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MIDU or QTJL?

Over the 3-year period, MIDU has performed better with a 27.63% return vs 19.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MIDU or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MIDU or QTJL?

MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between MIDU and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.