MIDU vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MIDU (Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares) and BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - MIDU tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%) while BULZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MIDU returned 23.88%/yr vs 77.02%/yr for BULZ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIDU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

MIDU vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 41.54% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 54.96% return.

MIDU

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 10.51%
• YTD: 41.54%
• 6M: 35.51%
• 1Y: 66.94%
• 3Y*: 23.88%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 12.76%

BULZ

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -11.00%
• YTD: 54.96%
• 6M: 57.61%
• 1Y: 163.08%
• 3Y*: 77.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDU vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares	41.54%	-2.75%	20.32%	27.79%	-49.27%	14.90%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	54.96%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and BULZ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.66

The correlation between MIDU and BULZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MIDU vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MIDU	BULZ
Industrials	25.0%	-
Technology	15.7%	62.3%
Financial Services	14.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	12.8%
Healthcare	8.6%	-
Real Estate	7.5%	-
Energy	5.5%	-
Basic Materials	4.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	-
Utilities	3.1%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	25.0%

Return for Risk

MIDU vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDU

MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 50
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDU vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIDU	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	2.12	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.36	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	3.03	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.65	7.94	+0.71

MIDU vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIDU	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.26%	-94.44%	+8.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.80%	-54.22%	+28.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.41%	-67.96%	+7.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-26.99%	+25.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.41%	-58.18%	+35.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.77%	20.62%	-12.85%

Volatility

MIDU vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) is 15.07%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 30.02%. This indicates that MIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIDU	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.07%	30.02%	-14.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.90%	61.86%	-26.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.43%	77.55%	-30.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.59%	91.54%	-31.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.65%	91.54%	-27.89%

MIDU vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIDU vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.63%	1.04%	1.10%	1.43%	0.11%	0.00%	0.06%	0.71%	0.70%	2.67%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIDU and BULZ in my portfolio?

MIDU and BULZ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIDU or BULZ?

BULZ has higher volatility (30.02%) compared to MIDU (15.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, MIDU or BULZ?

On 3-year performance, BULZ leads with 77.02% vs 23.88% for MIDU. On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MIDU has been the lower-risk option at 15.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MIDU or BULZ?

Over the 3-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 77.02% return vs 23.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MIDU or BULZ?

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MIDU or BULZ?

MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between MIDU and BULZ?

MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.