PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BULZ vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BULZFNGU
YTD Return63.00%125.74%
1Y Return117.90%186.34%
3Y Return (Ann)-18.89%3.99%
Sharpe Ratio1.662.60
Sortino Ratio2.072.71
Omega Ratio1.281.37
Calmar Ratio1.502.97
Martin Ratio5.8510.73
Ulcer Index19.87%17.24%
Daily Std Dev70.05%71.12%
Max Drawdown-94.44%-92.34%
Current Drawdown-50.44%-6.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between BULZ and FNGU is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BULZ vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 63.00% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 125.74% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
35.27%
52.85%
BULZ
FNGU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BULZ vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BULZ and FNGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


BULZ
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
Expense ratio chart for BULZ: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FNGU: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BULZ vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BULZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.07
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 5.85, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.85
FNGU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.97
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 10.73, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.73

BULZ vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULZ and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.66
2.60
BULZ
FNGU

Dividends

BULZ vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BULZ nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BULZ vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-50.44%
-6.04%
BULZ
FNGU

Volatility

BULZ vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a higher volatility of 21.89% compared to MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) at 19.59%. This indicates that BULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.89%
19.59%
BULZ
FNGU