BULZ vs. SMCI
BULZ (MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive FANG Innovation Index (300%), while SMCI (Super Micro Computer, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, BULZ returned 65.65%/yr vs -2.17%/yr for SMCI. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BULZ vs. SMCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 38.16% return, which is significantly higher than SMCI's -5.50% return.
BULZ
- 1D
- -7.41%
- 1M
- -10.84%
- 6M
- 28.00%
- YTD
- 38.16%
- 1Y
- 98.38%
- 3Y*
- 65.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCI
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -5.50%
- 1Y
- -43.83%
- 3Y*
- -2.17%
- 5Y*
- 51.68%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
BULZ vs. SMCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs | 38.16% | 60.09% | 54.09% | 394.22% | -92.26% | 9.17% |
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | -5.50% | -3.97% | 7.23% | 246.24% | 86.80% | 20.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULZ and SMCI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between BULZ and SMCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULZ vs. SMCI — Risk / Return Rank
BULZ
SMCI
BULZ vs. SMCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BULZ | SMCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.96 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | -0.66 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | -1.05 | +5.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BULZ vs. SMCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than SMCI's maximum drawdown of -84.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and SMCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULZ | SMCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -84.84% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.22% | -66.18% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.96% | -84.84% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.91% | -76.72% | +41.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.75% | -32.15% | -25.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.26% | 41.80% | -19.54% |
Volatility
BULZ vs. SMCI - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) has a higher volatility of 29.07% compared to Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) at 27.52%. This indicates that BULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULZ | SMCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.07% | 27.52% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.30% | 79.27% | -13.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.12% | 87.04% | -5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.70% | 87.28% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.70% | 71.58% | +20.12% |
Dividends
BULZ vs. SMCI - Dividend Comparison
Neither BULZ nor SMCI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BULZ and SMCI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BULZ has higher volatility (29.07%) compared to SMCI (27.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULZ dropped -94.44% vs SMCI's -84.84%.
BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BULZ and SMCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer