MGV vs. VXUS
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 12.84%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for VXUS. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
MGV vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MGV having a 14.01% return and VXUS slightly higher at 14.45%. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 12.84%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.
MGV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 14.01%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 19.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 31.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
MGV vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 14.01% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.45% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and VXUS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MGV and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MGV vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
VXUS
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
MGV
VXUS
Healthcare
MGV
VXUS
Technology
MGV
VXUS
Industrials
MGV
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
MGV
VXUS
Energy
MGV
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
VXUS
Communication Services
MGV
VXUS
Utilities
MGV
VXUS
Basic Materials
MGV
VXUS
Real Estate
MGV
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
VXUS
MGV vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGV | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.38 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 2.80 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.05 | 10.92 | +6.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGV | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | 2.08 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.53 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.57 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
MGV vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -55.87%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.87% | -35.97% | -19.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -11.27% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -13.58% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -29.44% | +12.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -35.97% | +0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.82% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -8.22% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.88% | -1.20% |
Volatility
MGV vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 2.37%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 5.46% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 13.00% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 15.20% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 16.04% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 17.15% | -0.82% |
MGV vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MGV and VXUS have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than VXUS's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.65% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGV and VXUS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to MGV (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -55.87% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.84% vs 9.69% for VXUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV and VXUS have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.87% for MGV.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer