MGV vs. VDE
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 13.43%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for VDE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
MGV vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 22.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 13.43%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.84% annualized return.
MGV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
VDE
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 6M
- 24.09%
- 1Y
- 26.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
MGV vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.85% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 22.80% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and VDE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGV and VDE has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MGV vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
VDE
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
MGV
VDE
-
Technology
MGV
VDE
-
Healthcare
MGV
VDE
-
Industrials
MGV
VDE
Consumer Defensive
MGV
VDE
-
Energy
MGV
VDE
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
VDE
-
Communication Services
MGV
VDE
-
Basic Materials
MGV
VDE
Utilities
MGV
VDE
-
Real Estate
MGV
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
VDE
MGV vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGV | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.22 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 1.90 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.12 | 5.92 | +12.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGV vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -74.20% | +18.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -14.20% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -21.41% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -26.58% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -69.29% | +33.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.11% | +13.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -19.94% | +12.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 4.57% | -2.88% |
Volatility
MGV vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 3.32%, while Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 7.02% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 16.69% | -8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 20.84% | -10.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 26.37% | -12.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 29.96% | -13.60% |
MGV vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than VDE's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.56% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGV and VDE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.43% vs 8.84% for VDE. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDE.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.82% for MGV.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VDE is Energy Equities. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.09% for VDE.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer