PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. MEIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly higher than MEIIX's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed MEIIX with an annualized return of 12.84%, while MEIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.


MGV

1D
0.77%
1M
4.80%
YTD
14.01%
6M
14.90%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
12.84%

MEIIX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
4.05%
6M
5.36%
1Y
12.98%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGV vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
14.01%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%
MEIIX
MFS Value Fund Class I
4.05%13.26%11.86%8.21%-6.02%25.43%3.99%30.04%-9.90%17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and MEIIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.95

The correlation between MGV and MEIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIIX
MEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGVMEIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.21

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

1.86

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

6.41

+10.64

MGV vs. MEIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the MEIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and MEIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGVMEIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

1.21

+1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.55

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.59

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Drawdowns

MGV vs. MEIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -55.87%, which is greater than MEIIX's maximum drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and MEIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVMEIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.87%

-52.64%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-6.76%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-13.19%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-17.58%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-36.70%

+1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.22%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-6.55%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.96%

-0.28%

Volatility

MGV vs. MEIIX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) at 2.23%. This indicates that MGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVMEIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

2.23%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

7.70%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

10.38%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

13.92%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

16.55%

-0.22%

MGV vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGV vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than MEIIX's 9.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIIX
MFS Value Fund Class I
9.34%9.52%9.30%8.41%7.58%3.32%2.63%3.17%3.62%4.04%2.91%5.97%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MGV and MEIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGV has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to MEIIX (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -55.87% vs MEIIX's -52.64%.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and MEIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer