MGV vs. ILCV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - MGV tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index while ILCV tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 12.76%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for ILCV. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCV.

Performance

MGV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 13.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed ILCV with an annualized return of 12.76%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.

MGV

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 10.64%
• YTD: 17.26%
• 1Y: 29.26%
• 3Y*: 18.40%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: 12.76%
• ALL TIME*: 9.32%

ILCV

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 3.16%
• 6M: 10.49%
• YTD: 13.67%
• 1Y: 30.69%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 12.72%
• 10Y*: 11.86%
• ALL TIME*: 8.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	$2.01M	$2.25M	$2.59M
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	$37.79M	$38.66M	$40.05M

MGV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	17.26%	15.45%	16.94%	9.16%	-1.22%	25.93%	2.50%	25.54%	-4.13%	16.85%
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	13.67%	18.79%	17.03%	14.43%	-7.02%	26.71%	-0.84%	25.19%	-6.24%	15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and ILCV is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007	0.95

The correlation between MGV and ILCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MGV vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MGV	ILCV
Financial Services	23.1%	18.3%
Technology	18.1%	22.6%
Healthcare	16.7%	12.6%
Industrials	13.8%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	10.7%	7.3%
Energy	5.5%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	3.8%	9.6%
Communication Services	3.0%	9.9%
Basic Materials	2.3%	2.1%
Utilities	2.0%	3.4%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.9%

Return for Risk

MGV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGV

MGV Risk / Return Rank: 94
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

ILCV

ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 95
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGV	ILCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	3.09	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	4.35	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.57	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	4.71	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.81	19.70	-1.89

MGV vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, roughly equal to the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and ILCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGV	ILCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.07%	-58.63%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.42%	-6.55%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.18%	-14.95%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.54%	-18.58%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.41%	-35.53%	+0.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	0.00%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-9.26%	+1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	1.56%	+0.09%

Volatility

MGV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 2.77%, while iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGV	ILCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	2.93%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	7.41%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.21%	10.00%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.55%	14.17%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.30%	16.64%	-0.34%

MGV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MGV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than ILCV's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	1.54%	1.77%	1.99%	2.27%	2.32%	2.01%	2.96%	2.70%	2.93%	2.32%	2.76%	3.01%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	1.86%	2.04%	2.31%	2.48%	2.45%	2.17%	2.47%	2.69%	2.65%	2.34%	2.53%	2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGV and ILCV in my portfolio?

MGV and ILCV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGV or ILCV?

ILCV has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to MGV (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

Which ETF is better, MGV or ILCV?

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.76% vs 11.86% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MGV or ILCV?

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGV or ILCV?

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MGV or ILCV?

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.54% for ILCV.

What is the main difference between MGV and ILCV?

MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.04% for ILCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.