MGV vs. DIA
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 13.43%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for DIA. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DIA.
Performance
MGV vs. DIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 8.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MGV having a 13.43% annualized return and DIA not far ahead at 13.70%.
MGV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
DIA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
MGV vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.85% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 8.40% | 14.71% | 14.82% | 16.02% | -7.02% | 20.83% | 9.59% | 24.70% | -3.74% | 28.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and DIA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MGV and DIA shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MGV vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
DIA
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
MGV
DIA
Technology
MGV
DIA
Healthcare
MGV
DIA
Industrials
MGV
DIA
Consumer Defensive
MGV
DIA
Energy
MGV
DIA
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
DIA
Communication Services
MGV
DIA
Basic Materials
MGV
DIA
Utilities
MGV
DIA
-
Real Estate
MGV
DIA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
DIA
MGV vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.35 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 2.52 | +2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.12 | 9.72 | +8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGV vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than DIA's maximum drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and DIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -51.87% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -9.76% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -15.95% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -20.76% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -36.70% | +1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.13% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 2.52% | -0.83% |
Volatility
MGV vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 3.32%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 4.16% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 9.76% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 12.45% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 14.84% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.57% | -1.21% |
MGV vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than DIA's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.39% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGV and DIA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs DIA's -51.87%.
On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.70% vs 13.43% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.70% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for DIA.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.39% for DIA.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.16% for DIA.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and DIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer