MGK vs. UMI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc.. MGK is passively managed, while UMI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGK returned 14.87%/yr vs 19.88%/yr for UMI. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UMI.

Performance

MGK vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 24.00% return.

MGK

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 6.21%
• 1Y: 24.77%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: 14.87%
• 10Y*: 18.85%

UMI

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 24.00%
• 6M: 23.82%
• 1Y: 25.24%
• 3Y*: 27.76%
• 5Y*: 19.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF	5.33%	20.67%	32.94%	51.67%	-33.59%	28.58%	41.01%	37.38%	-2.91%	2.02%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	24.00%	5.11%	42.97%	14.60%	20.78%	20.97%	-8.25%	21.06%	-10.64%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and UMI is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017	0.30

The correlation between MGK and UMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MGK vs. UMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MGK	UMI
Technology	56.1%	-
Communication Services	17.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	-
Healthcare	4.5%	-
Financial Services	4.5%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Utilities	1.2%	1.0%
Industrials	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	-
Energy	-	99.0%

Return for Risk

MGK vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK

MGK Risk / Return Rank: 39
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 35

UMI

UMI Risk / Return Rank: 64
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 59
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGK	UMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.83	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.53	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	3.43	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.65	9.22	-4.58

MGK vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and UMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGK vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, roughly equal to the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and UMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGK	UMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.43%	-48.08%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.85%	-7.50%	-9.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	-17.08%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.01%	-20.05%	-15.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.63%	-3.61%	-2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-6.59%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	2.79%	+2.18%

Volatility

MGK vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) at 5.61%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGK	UMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	5.61%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.29%	11.01%	+2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.87%	14.09%	+2.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.72%	19.54%	+3.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.93%	23.17%	-1.24%

MGK vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGK vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than UMI's 5.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF	0.33%	0.35%	0.43%	0.50%	0.70%	0.41%	0.65%	0.85%	1.12%	1.23%	1.53%	1.43%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	5.91%	6.23%	4.39%	4.67%	4.36%	3.00%	2.18%	2.47%	2.48%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGK and UMI in my portfolio?

MGK and UMI have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGK or UMI?

MGK has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to UMI (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs UMI's -48.08%.

Which ETF is better, MGK or UMI?

On 5-year performance, UMI leads with 19.88% vs 14.87% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, UMI has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MGK or UMI?

Over the 5-year period, UMI has performed better with a 19.88% return vs 14.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGK or UMI?

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MGK or UMI?

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

What is the main difference between MGK and UMI?

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.85% for UMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.