PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.


MGK

1D
-1.13%
1M
7.26%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.45%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
19.24%

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
10.01%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%7.84%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and MFUS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.72

The correlation between MGK and MFUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MGK vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
MFUS

Technology

56.1%
21.8%

Communication Services

17.3%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
10.6%

Healthcare

4.5%
13.5%

Financial Services

4.5%
12.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Utilities

1.2%
1.7%

Industrials

1.1%
12.6%

Basic Materials

0.7%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
10.3%

Energy

-

7.0%

Technology

MGK
56.1%
MFUS
21.8%

Communication Services

MGK
17.3%
MFUS
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
12.8%
MFUS
10.6%

Healthcare

MGK
4.5%
MFUS
13.5%

Financial Services

MGK
4.5%
MFUS
12.6%

Real Estate

MGK
1.3%
MFUS
1.8%

Utilities

MGK
1.2%
MFUS
1.7%

Industrials

MGK
1.1%
MFUS
12.6%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.7%
MFUS
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
MFUS
10.3%

Energy

MGK

-

MFUS
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGKMFUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

2.63

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.77

-1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

4.41

-2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.15

18.13

-11.97

MGK vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGKMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.63

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.79

-0.13

Drawdowns

MGK vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.97%

-35.21%

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-6.39%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-15.39%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-18.22%

-17.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

0.00%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-4.00%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

1.55%

+3.34%

Volatility

MGK vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.19%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.19%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

8.22%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.23%

10.72%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

15.03%

+7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

17.35%

+4.53%

MGK vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGK vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%0.00%0.00%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.32%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGK and MFUS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGK has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, MGK leads with 16.25% vs 12.82% for MFUS. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MGK has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.

MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer