MGK vs. HLAL
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MGK tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGK returned 16.25%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
MGK vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.
MGK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 19.24%
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
MGK vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 10.01% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 9.57% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and HLAL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between MGK and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGK vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
HLAL
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
MGK
HLAL
Communication Services
MGK
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
HLAL
Healthcare
MGK
HLAL
Financial Services
MGK
HLAL
Real Estate
MGK
HLAL
Utilities
MGK
HLAL
Industrials
MGK
HLAL
Basic Materials
MGK
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
MGK
HLAL
Energy
MGK
-
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
HLAL
MGK vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGK | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 3.33 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 4.62 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.59 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 4.30 | -2.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 19.85 | -13.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGK | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 3.33 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.91 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.89 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
MGK vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.97% | -33.57% | -14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -10.20% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -21.67% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -23.18% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.07% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -5.00% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 2.20% | +2.69% |
Volatility
MGK vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 3.70%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 3.70% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 9.95% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 13.17% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 17.60% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 20.21% | +1.67% |
MGK vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGK vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than HLAL's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGK and HLAL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGK has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to HLAL (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, MGK leads with 16.25% vs 15.86% for HLAL. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MGK has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 15.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.
MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer