PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. HLAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.


MGK

1D
-1.13%
1M
7.26%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.45%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
19.24%

HLAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
9.45%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.75%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
10.01%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%9.57%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
18.72%18.30%16.70%30.13%-17.56%28.64%24.65%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and HLAL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.91

The correlation between MGK and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGK vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
HLAL

Technology

56.1%
50.4%

Communication Services

17.3%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
5.6%

Healthcare

4.5%
10.5%

Financial Services

4.5%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.8%

Utilities

1.2%
1.0%

Industrials

1.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.7%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
2.9%

Energy

-

4.5%

Technology

MGK
56.1%
HLAL
50.4%

Communication Services

MGK
17.3%
HLAL
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
12.8%
HLAL
5.6%

Healthcare

MGK
4.5%
HLAL
10.5%

Financial Services

MGK
4.5%
HLAL
0.0%

Real Estate

MGK
1.3%
HLAL
0.8%

Utilities

MGK
1.2%
HLAL
1.0%

Industrials

MGK
1.1%
HLAL
4.6%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.7%
HLAL
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
HLAL
2.9%

Energy

MGK

-

HLAL
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HLAL
HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGKHLALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

3.33

-1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

4.62

-2.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.59

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

4.30

-2.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.15

19.85

-13.69

MGK vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGKHLALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

3.33

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.91

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.89

-0.24

Drawdowns

MGK vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and HLAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKHLALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.97%

-33.57%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-10.20%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-21.67%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-23.18%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.07%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-5.00%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

2.20%

+2.69%

Volatility

MGK vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 3.70%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKHLALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.70%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

9.95%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.23%

13.17%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

17.60%

+5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

20.21%

+1.67%

MGK vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGK vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than HLAL's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.44%0.53%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.32%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGK and HLAL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGK has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to HLAL (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

On 5-year performance, MGK leads with 16.25% vs 15.86% for HLAL. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MGK has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 15.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.

MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.50% for HLAL.

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and HLAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer