PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.


MGK

1D
-1.13%
1M
7.26%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.45%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
19.24%

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
10.01%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%20.24%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and BBUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.93

The correlation between MGK and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGK vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
BBUS

Technology

56.1%
37.1%

Communication Services

17.3%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
9.4%

Healthcare

4.5%
8.1%

Financial Services

4.5%
10.8%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.7%

Utilities

1.2%
2.6%

Industrials

1.1%
7.2%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
4.5%

Energy

-

3.2%

Technology

MGK
56.1%
BBUS
37.1%

Communication Services

MGK
17.3%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
12.8%
BBUS
9.4%

Healthcare

MGK
4.5%
BBUS
8.1%

Financial Services

MGK
4.5%
BBUS
10.8%

Real Estate

MGK
1.3%
BBUS
1.7%

Utilities

MGK
1.2%
BBUS
2.6%

Industrials

MGK
1.1%
BBUS
7.2%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.7%
BBUS
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

MGK

-

BBUS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGKBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

3.00

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

13.76

-7.60

MGK vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGKBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.33

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.79

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.84

-0.18

Drawdowns

MGK vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.97%

-35.35%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-9.21%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-19.01%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-25.46%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.74%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-5.46%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

2.00%

+2.89%

Volatility

MGK vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.88%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

8.96%

+3.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.23%

11.87%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

17.03%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

19.59%

+2.29%

MGK vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGK vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.32%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MGK and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGK has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, MGK leads with 16.25% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MGK has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGK.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.

MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer